|
Post by Japic on Sept 15, 2003 11:02:56 GMT -5
Personally, I don't care. Even if I've seen your character sheet a dozen tims, I don't remember any of it. Hell, I can hardly remember which character name matches which OOC board members.
If you want to look at my sheet, feel free, I don't mind. Just because you know what I can do. Doesn't mean that you know what I will do. If you want to be surprised, don't look. To me, the only important part of your sheet is what you look like, and what class you are. That way I can imagine how you look, and a general idea of how you can aide the party.
That's my two bits.
|
|
|
Post by Japic on Sept 15, 2003 14:06:08 GMT -5
If the poll requires a specific response from me, then I suppose that I would vote no. My reason for this is two-fold. One. I don't really see a point to having K Man do the extra work. We've come this far as is, and I don't see any point to restricting that information. If you and I were at a gaming table, and I asked you about one of your stats. Lets just say.... Knowledge Arcana. Would you tell me that it was none of my business and that you want it to be a surprise? Or would you simply say how much it is? It makes it possible for us to get to know eachother a little better. To operate as a party more smoothly. Second. Lets say that he restricts the character sheets. And someone comes to the boards wanting to play. He/She sees that the igame is closed, and so decides to look at the story as it unfolds. As a third party person, not involved in the game, but merely watching. I would want every tidbit of information there was to know about Elexthan the wizard. To know about the history of each person, and watch them interact with oneanother. As strictly third party, that would be important to me.
My whole point is that secrecy isn't that important. If Kyle posted the NPCs and their intentions for all to see, then I could forsee issues. But not with a group of friends sitting around a table, sharing adventures.
|
|
|
Post by Toptomcat on Sept 15, 2003 14:25:55 GMT -5
I agree with Japic.
|
|
|
Post by BluSpecs on Sept 15, 2003 14:54:12 GMT -5
Not to gang up on you man, but I just say leave them up. I don't really look at them for anything other than names and history anyway.
|
|
thrawn86
Veteran of the War
We sit together, the mountain and I, until only the mountain remains.
Posts: 418
|
Post by thrawn86 on Sept 15, 2003 16:45:38 GMT -5
I vote no, only because I see no reason to lock them. I figure that everyone already knows what a first level rogue can do anyway.
|
|