|
|
Post by (George) 3.5./ ZEM ( 4.0) on Feb 2, 2016 13:30:34 GMT -5
( Thrack has shown no hostal act at all to the party. Has not even gone for a weapon. He just hates how beth was telling him what he can and Can't do, and said as much. Trust me if he wants to be hostal he could, those things he is hostal at end up dead.)
|
|
|
|
Post by falconis on Feb 2, 2016 13:32:50 GMT -5
( Thrack has shown no hostal act at all to the party. Has not even gone for a weapon. He just hates how beth was telling him what he can and Can't do, and said as much. Trust me if he wants to be hostal he could, those things he is hostal at end up dead.) |
|
|
|
Post by (George) 3.5./ ZEM ( 4.0) on Feb 2, 2016 13:43:36 GMT -5
(He was not complaning loadly that would be in captial letters if he were look at the post again. I think your over reacting in this case. And I would call that passave agressave maybe even then I feel your stretching that a lot.
He has shown no agression if he did a bar fight would brake out.
I simply dissagree with you and the statements and accusations you have made twords my character, I'm sooty if you feel otherwise.
If the dm has iusse with how I'm playing they can tell me, if you want to deal with his attitude in character I'm open to that. Yet telling me the player to outright change his personality I simply won't do that.
Pointing out also it's meda gaming for you have no clue how he intends to stop them. I see a lot of med gaming right now and I would like it to stop we are ment to be in character. Just cause we read a post of a conversation does not mean our character was there for it.
Right now Only beth and Komand know his intent.
you weren't there when he told them that you came in after.
Now he may have implied sure fine but he is not being hostile to the party at all so that is the part I take issue with.
He's not yelling at anyone that would be in capital letters as well if he was.
He is not happy ok a glear is not saying I'm going to puch u.
If he was that pissed and mad his weapons would be out,there not. So in this case your very much wrong in what you said.
Now I very much would like to get back to being in character for this page is for playing not arguments ty.)
|
|
|
|
Post by falconis on Feb 2, 2016 13:49:56 GMT -5
( I simply dissagree with you and the statements and accusations you have made twords my character. Pointing out also it's meda gaming for you have no clue how he intends to stop them. I see a lot of med gaming and I would like it to stop. Right now Only beth and Komand know you weren't there when he told them that. Now he may have implied sure fine but he is not being hostile to the party at all. He's not yelling that would be in capital letters if he was. He is not happy but if he was that pissed and mad his weapons would be out,there not. So in this case your very much wrong in what you said. ((My character entered the conversation before your latest in character post. Unless all of what was said in that post was OOC, my character heard that much. Besides that, you don't have to yell to be hostile. Hostility is in behavior, not always in words. Your character glared at Beth. That is a hostile action. Thrack is insisting that he won't work with Beth due to her plan is also aggressive, although not quite hostile. A character can feel that criticism is unwarranted, but, it seems that given my character didn't say anything about yours, your claims of metagaming is also unwarranted)) |
|
|
|
Post by (George) 3.5./ ZEM ( 4.0) on Feb 2, 2016 13:59:15 GMT -5
I'm not going to argue with u anymore on this page this page is for playing. I'm sorry you feel otherwise. We agree to dissagree
|
|
|
|
Post by harknail on Feb 2, 2016 14:50:43 GMT -5
There's nothing wrong with Thrack being unhappy that Beth wants to capture the Bandits alive. That's roleplaying. As is Beth wanting to take them alive for her own personal reasons.
There's also nothing wrong with Aegis thinking Thrack is showing some hostility towards Beth (although obviously not open hostility), based on Thrack's reply to what his profession is, and wondering what the cause of it is. This is also roleplay, and may lead to some interaction between Aegis and Thrack as Aegis tries to determine what is up.
What is wrong is trying to tell other players how their characters should interpret your characters actions and words. The two of you seem to have a different idea of what hostility is, the dictionary simply says "unfriendliness or opposition". Thrack has announced he opposed to Beth's idea, that is a valid reason to label Thrack as having some hostility. It doesn't mean he thinks Thrack is about to start a fight, only that there are issues to be worked out before they go on a mission together. Which can lead to more roleplaying, as Beth and Thrack explain their positions in character. Or maybe they'll decide to go on one of the other quests, where this issue has yet to come up.
On the other hand, there is nothing in Thrack's post that indicates that he was speaking any louder than usual when he was talking about Beth. Though I get the impression that his normal volume is loader than most (but that's just me).
Now can someone please answere Aegis's question in character: Are we about to be involved in another expedition? I hope Hurick is leading us again, he's pretty good at leading a company of adventurers
|
|
